Publication: The League of Women Voters of Illinois Website
Link: http://tinyurl.com/9vght9m
Date Published: September 26, 2012
THE AMENDMENT PROPOSAL: The measure would amend the General Provisions Article of the Illinois Constitution requiring a three-fifths majority vote of each chamber of the General Assembly, or the governing body of a unit of local government, school district, or pension or retirement system, in order to increase a benefit under any public pension or retirement system. The full text is available here: http://tinyurl.com/9u4k8vv.
RATIONALE FOR OPPOSITION: Our objection is squarely focused on the proposal's 3/5 majority vote requirement, not on pension reform issues. We are acting under our Representative Government position to promote an open governmental system that is representative, accountable and responsive.
The Illinois League has a strong record supporting measures to make our democracy more, not less, representative. Our interest in and experience with constitutional amendments are extensive, including detailed study and active participation in the 1970 Constitutional Convention where we strenuously advocated for simply majority votes on constitutional matters.
As an organization that has been active in the legislative process, we have witnessed first hand what the Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure confirms: Some people mistakenly assume that the higher the vote required to take an action, the greater the protection of the members. Instead, the opposite is true. Whenever a vote of more than a majority is required to take action, control is taken from the majority and given to a minority.
The Illinois Constitution is not the place for a provision that is this specific to a single issue and to one remedy for a larger problem. If the legislature determines this needs to be done, a statute which can be modified more easily is the appropriate course to take.
What Are You Doing to Protect your Future?
Join SUAA Now!
http://tinyurl.com/join-uicunited
"Some people mistakenly assume that the higher the vote required to take an action, the greater the protection of the members. Instead, the opposite is true. Whenever a vote of more than a majority is required to take action, control is taken from the majority and given to a minority." Very powerful.
ReplyDelete